A brave doctor Publicly reverses his position on the covid shots

by Brucha Weisberger
598 views

BS”D

Dr. Aseem Malhotra of England is a top cardiologist. He used to really believe the covid shots were safe. He got the vaccines himself, right when they came out. In fact, he even appeared on British television urging Indian film director Gurinder Chadha to get vaccinated.

Dr. Malhotra’s own father got the covid-19 shots, and died 6 months later due to two major arteries becoming severely blocked.

The tragedy led this unusually-independent thinking doctor on a six-month-long investigation of what actually caused his father’s death, and he reached an uncomfortable conclusion. He wrote a set of two papers that were peer reviewed over the course of three months, and just published.

Dr. Malhotra not only urgently calls for a pause in the administration of the covid shots, but terms what has happened “the greatest miscarriage of medical science that we will see in our lifetime.”

Dr. Malhotra tweeted on September 28:

The most important announcement of my life and career so far. Please watch, listen and share with family and friends. I reached these sobering conclusions reluctantly. To read the free full open access peer reviewed medical journal articles visit http://insulinresistance.org

For anyone who can’t play the short video of Dr. Malhotra that he tweeted (above), here is the transcript of his words:

“Having been double jabbed, and being one of the first to take the Pfizer vaccine, I have, after several months critically appraising the data, speaking to eminent scientists in Oxford, Stanford, and Harvard, speaking to two investigative medical journalists, and being contacted by two Pfizer whistleblowers, reluctantly concluded that this vaccine is not completely safe, and has unprecedented harms. Which leads me to conclude that it needs to be suspended until all the raw data has been released for independent analysis.”

I want to digress for a moment to focus on some of the replies to his tweet, which are quite illuminating. In addition to those thanking Dr. Malhotra for bravely coming forth with the scientific truth he discovered, others angry at him for promoting the shots to begin with, and those with their own personal terrible experiences post-vaccine, there were many distinctly anti-scientific voices. These comments illustrate how deep a hold the propaganda has. Careful investigations, even by a formerly pro-vax doctor -if showing the opposite of what the establishment has promoted nonstop – are just impossible for some people to accept. Even if they’re peer reviewed.

Here are a selection of the replies to Dr. Malhotra. (Don’t worry, there were plenty of nice ones too!)

One: I once watched you speak at a conference. You gave fantastic advice that changed how I treat my patients. Then this. It’s really sad to see such a fall from a position of respect you once held.

Another: Should the country wait to see how many die from NOT taking the vaccination, before scare mongering!? (BW: Actually, that happened. First there was no vaccine, and many people died with covid, or from lack of treatment and from ventilators. But now, even more have died from the vaccine since the rollout.)

And: What would have been the outcome without the vaccine? (BW: Much better! Did this person read his paper? The increased negative outcome as a result of the vaccine is exactly what he’s showing.)

Are you a real doctor?

Is this parody?

And the “best”: Your father would be ashamed of you. He would say….why are you following in the footsteps of Wakefield?

Some questioned why the papers were published in a diabetes journal. The answer is simple. That journal is one of the few not funded by Big Pharma. Those that are, would probably never have accepted Dr. Malhotra’s papers, because it would cost them everything in revenue loss from their corporate sponsors.

One tweet claimed that Dr. Malhotra isn’t qualified to weigh in on this topic, since he’s not an immunologist or a virologist. This is a critical point to answer because so many people make the same mistake. They think that only special experts can analyze data and use their brains in their trained fields, while the rest of us cannot possibly have the capacity to figure out the truth (even if we are doctors or scientists!)

In actuality, any intelligent human being can make an in depth study of a topic and discover the truth. “Leave it to the experts” has been an important piece of the propaganda campaign. They win by getting us to shut off our minds and just listen to the “ones who know.”

On another note, this reply tweet is the most interesting: True i did work 4 month till end of August 2022 at pfizer and none of the employees are vaccinated.

Here is the story in the Epoch Times about Dr. Aseem Malhotra, with over 500 comments.

Steve Kirsch summed up the main points of this groundbreaking story very well in his article today.

Top doctor who once promoted COVID vaccines on TV, now says they should be halted

Excerpts:

  1. Dr. Aseem Malhotra is a well known, highly respected British cardiologist and evidence-based medicine expert. He promoted the COVID vaccines on British TV, even appearing on “Good Morning Britain” to advise Indian film director Gurinder Chadha to get the shot.
  2. He started doing research on the vaccine after the suspicious death of his father who died after getting the vaccine, and found the connection. Two of his father’s major arteries were severely blocked, even though Malhotra described his father as a fit person who did not have any significant heart problems.
  3. His father died 6 months after getting the Pfizer vaccine. This is totally consistent with the 5 month average delay time for massive clots appearing after getting the COVID vaccines. This is what the embalmers found as well: the large clots only started appearing in mid-2021.
  4. Aseem spent 6 months looking at data critically including talking with other top scientists. He “slowly and reluctantly” came to the conclusion he was wrong about the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines. His journey was documented in his first paper. He mentions he teaches evidence-based medicine and follows all the principles.
  5. In January, 2022, he started writing up what he found.
  6. On Sept 26, 2022 the two papers he wrote, calling for a halt to the COVID vaccines, were published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
  7. He told the Epoch Times, “There is more than enough evidence—I would say the evidence is overwhelming—to pause the rollout of the vaccine.” 
  8. Nobody has attacked any of the facts he used as a basis for the conclusion in his paper.
  9. He has no conflicts of interest that would cause him to “switch sides.”
  10. They can’t attack him on his motivation or his facts. The paper was peer-reviewed for 3 months.
  11. At the press conference to announce his papers and change of heart, only GB News attended. This was the same news organization that was the only major news organization to cover the Israeli safety data coverup.

I asked how many journals refused to publish his papers. The surprising answer is zero. He simply submitted the papers to one of the very few medical journals with no ties to big pharma and no advertising and would take a paper of 10,000 words.

Here are links to the two papers he wrote (had to be split into two because of size limits) that are now published in a peer-reviewed medical journal:

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine (Part 1 and Part 2).

These papers, both published on Sept 26, 2022, talk about how we got it wrong, why we got it wrong, and solutions.

The papers conclude:

There is a strong scientific, ethical and moral case to be made that the current COVID vaccine administration must stop until all the raw data has been subjected to fully independent scrutiny. Looking to the future the medical and public health professions must recognise these failings and eschew the tainted dollar of the medical-industrial complex. It will take a lot of time and effort to rebuild trust in these institutions, but the health – of both humanity and the medical profession – depends on it.

and

It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.

Click here to read Steve’s full article.

Dr. Tess Lawrie talks about the tragic – but not shocking – lack of media coverage at Dr. Malhotra’s press conference, in her writeup:

What our press conference with Dr Aseem Malhotra tells us about the fourth estate

His U-turn on Covid vaccine safety could save countless lives – if only mainstream media would give his message the airtime it deserves

Many British viewers will know Dr Malhotra from his appearances on the TV show Good Morning Britain. He is a well-known, highly respected consultant cardiologist who actively promoted Covid-19 vaccination until the sudden and tragic death of his father from suspected vaccine-induced cardiac arrest led him to uncover the truth about these toxic injections.

Nine months on, he has now published a paper on his findings in Journal of Insulin Resistance. Today at the press conference, he spoke about the paper, and answered questions from journalists. Dr. Ryan Cole also presented via video link a comprehensive explanation of vaccine damage through the body, sharing images of what spike protein deposition in various tissues and the accompanying inflammation look like under the microscope.

Aseem, Ryan, myself and World Council for Health have the same message – that is, that the Covid-19 vaccines must be withdrawn.

This message is not new, as you well know. Back in June 2021 we sent a preliminary report to Dr June Raine, Chief Executive of the (MHRA) highlighting the high number of adverse event reports and calling for the vaccine roll-out to be halted. In June this year, the World Council for Health published a Pharmacovigilance Report on vaccine adverse events that makes it clear these injections are harming people. And, there are many other doctors and scientists and health advocates who have been voicing concerns for months.

So no, this message is not new – but what matters is that former Covid vaccine champions like Aseem are speaking up. That takes humility and courage in equal measure. And, given his high profile and good standing, his plea that the vaccines be withdrawn may land with people who may never have listened otherwise. That is, if they ever get to hear his message.

We invited mainstream media including the BBC and daily newspapers to this important press conference. We did dare to hope, but while over 11,000 people tuned in to watch the livestream, none of these mainstream journalists bothered to turn up – the exception being GB News, and we extend our thanks to them for that. The absence of everyone else is telling. In service to private corporations and funders such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, they no longer serve the public who buy their papers and tune in to their programming, if indeed they ever did.

Their core function is to spread propaganda and they could not care less for us. We need to boycott them entirely in my opinion: they are only powerful if we bother to tune in. Let’s turn off the TV and stop buying their papers. Rather than being passive consumers, we can be our own journalists, sharing vital information with our own communities and networks, and supporting those channels that do stand up for the truth. So, let’s do this, right now.

There are many doctors like Dr Malhotra who have either changed their position on the Covid injections, or are questioning their safety. This is not surprising – the data on vaccine harms have become too overwhelming to ignore. Now is the time for us to support these doctors as they ask questions and seek answers. For many, even questioning comes at a huge cost.

Click here for Dr. Tess Lawrie’s full article.

Here is an excellent article appearing in AMGreatness about Dr. Malhotra’s explosive announcement and papers:

British Cardiologist Who Initially Promoted COVID Vaccines, Releases Peer Reviewed Papers Calling For Suspension of mRNA Shots

Debra Heine September 27, 2022

Excerpts:

Dr. Aseem Malhotra, an eminent British cardiologist who helped promote the mRNA vaccines when they were first rolled out, is now calling for the suspension of the injections until all the raw data from clinical trials are released for independent scrutiny, and all adverse side effects are fully investigated, the World Council For Health reported.

In a two-part peer-reviewed paper published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance on Monday, Malhotra presented real world data revealing that in the non-elderly population, the risk of suffering a serious adverse event from the jabs are greater than the any benefits. [See part one here, part two here.].

BW: The evidence is VERY CLEAR that the shots kill way more elderly people than they “save.” You can find this evidence in some of my previous articles. Either Dr. Malhotra didn’t see this evidence or he held back from saying the full truth, as we’ve seen other mainstream doctors do when they first start speaking out and are hesitant.

Malhotra is a Consultant Cardiologist, Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, and President of the Public Health Collaboration, and an honorary council member to the Metabolic Psychiatry Clinic at Stanford University school of medicine California.  He is an internationally renowned expert in the prevention, diagnosis and management of heart disease.

His re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna randomized controlled trial data also found that the risk of suffering serious adverse effects of mRNA vaccines for individuals is significantly higher than the risk of being hospitalized with Covid-19.

The study found that the international roll-out of mRNA vaccination program overstated benefits of vaccination especially in low-risk populations, and the under-reported adverse events.

Commenting on the report, Malhotra said, “There has been a rise in out of hospital cardiac arrests and heart attacks linked to Pfizer’s Covid-19 mRNA vaccine with plausible biological mechanisms of harm.” He added, “pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.”

Malhotra’s paper presented data showing a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England in 2021 (an extra 14,000 compared to 2020). Similar data from Israel in the 16–39-year-old age group showed there was a 25 percent increase in heart attacks or cardiac arrests associated with the BionTech Pfizer vaccine administration that was not associated with Covid-19. These findings mirror a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 clinical trial, the cardiologist found.

Citing the FDA’s own website, Malhotra argued that testing positive for antibodies is an unreliable marker for immunity or protection against COVID-19 post-vaccination.

“It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally,” he concluded.  “Authorities and sections of the medical profession have supported unethical, coercive, and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, undermining the principles of informed consent. These regrettable actions are a symptom of the ‘medical misinformation mess.’”

The report cites a recent analysis of all cause death data that found “prescribed medications now are the third most common cause of death after heart disease and cancer because of side effects, and they are mostly preventable.”

Underlying causes for this failure include regulatory capture – guardians that are supposed to protect the public are in fact funded by the very corporations that stand to gain from the sale of those medications. A failure of public health messaging has also resulted in wanton waste of resources and a missed opportunity to help individuals lead healthier lives with relatively simple – and low cost – lifestyle changes.

The unprecedented roll-out of an emergency use authorisation vaccine without access to the raw data, with increasing evidence of significant harms, compounded by mandates that appear to serve no purpose other than to bolster the profits of the drug industry, have highlighted modern medicine’s worst failings on an epic scale, with additional catastrophic harms to trust in public health.

There is a strong scientific, ethical and moral case to be made that the current Covid vaccine administration must stop until all the raw data has been subjected to fully independent scrutiny. Looking to the future the medical and public health professionals must recognise these failings and eschew the tainted dollar of the medical – industrial complex. It will take a lot of time and effort to rebuild trust in these institutions, but the health of both humanity and the medical profession depend on it.

Part two of the review explores the capture of the regulatory agencies, and lays out how the immense financial power of pharmaceutical corporations influences politicians and media to promote products at the expense of scientific scrutiny and unfettered access to research.

Bias and conflicts of interest abound in the medical-industrial complex with well documented adverse outcome for patients from overmedicalisation and prescription drugs. Coercive vaccine mandates based on biased and short trials with unpublished raw data is the culmination of the uncheck power of the pharmaceutical industry to the exclusion of effective lifestyle factor risk reduction which was ignored by media and politicians alike.

Malhotra concludes “We must use this as an opportunity to transform the system to produce better doctors, better decision making, healthier patients and restore trust in medicine and public health. Until all the raw data on the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines have been independently analyzed, any claims purporting that they confer a net benefit to humankind cannot be considered to be evidence based.”

There is much more, but I’ll stop here. The entire AMGreatness article can be viewed here:

Imagine if, G-d willing, this could get to everyone around the world. The mainstream media won’t help us with that, but maybe you can!

Originally published on truth613.substack.com

ate="Admination" >

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More