WhatsappThis will make any progressive squirm – because it is the truth. Any country that has taken in a large number of Islamic adherents over the last 10-20 years is now dealing with all of the negative fallout from the policy decisions made so recently.
The difference between the United States and most of Western Europe is that the United States is not 10% Islamic – yet. It has far less Islamic adherents percentage wise than countries such as Sweden, France, and England. That matters alot. That is one of the reasons why so many reasonable people in the United States are correct in wanting to close up the borders. They are indeed saving the United States.
But more than just stopping the flow of immigrants into the United States, the problematic populations that are inside of the United States – whether Islamic or not – should be monitored. This is straightforward logic. Any individual and certainly any group, that poses an imminent or growing security threat to American citizenry must be watched and disrupted before it is too late.
Sleeper cells are not just a figment of the minds of some conspiratorial minds. There is a major uptick of attacks inside the United States because of weaker surveillance from the FBI. The Trump administration has made major advances in this direction. This should continue well past the Trump administration or else more and more cities across the United States will not just become inhospitable for the Jewish population, but for everyone living there.
The Jewish people are just the first target. But the haters will keep at it until they are stopped.
Separation of religion and state in the United States of America was not merely set up in order to dampen the religious fervor that drove many of the European Wars in the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries. It was one of the basic tenets of the ideas of freedom that the founders brilliantly foresaw as a pillar of the Constitution.
The Founders were much more religious than most of the leaders of the USA today, but they did not believe in forcing their religion or any religion down the throats of others. And they certainly did not believe in slitting the throats of those who did not submit to their religion. Charlie Kirk may have been properly called an Islamaphobe. There is indeed what to be concerned about the negative effects of radical Islam on the world.
