As people continue to attack me and others for voicing our opinions, raising concerns and questions regarding the way the medical establishment, the media and government, have been dealing with the corona/covid-19 virus and the whole “vaccine is the only solution” direction, I wanted to provide links and information for people truly interested in understanding where my concerns and questions come from.
Why am I the one being called a fearmongerer for sharing information from doctors and scientists providing critical information?
As I have posted a number of times, there are early-diagnosis medical treatments that are saving people’s lives all over the world from the corona/Covid-19 virus. It is maddening to know that the information regarding the various treatments, which could’ve saved hundreds of thousands of lives, is being suppressed and censored with doctors being threatened and even fired for treating patients with them.
In some places in the US and Israel, pharmacies are even forbidden from giving them to people with prescriptions if they are to treat corona/covid-19. It makes no sense. Hence I have been vocal about it.
For anyone who wants to see studies, studies and more studies about the two main early-diagnosis treatments, Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, then here are links to read through that show their effectiveness.
Are either one 100%? No, and neither is any vaccine. Again, speak to your own medical experts about what you should do and what treatment to use.
Also, as Epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch said in his Senate testimony, even after people take the vaccine, it is still important for there to be a focus on early-diagnosis treatment. Suppressing information about the early-diagnosis treatments, and not investing in them, is very troubling. Dr. Risch’s voice is a very important voice of logic that unfortunately is being ignored by much of the medical establishment, the media and government.
Again, here are the links of studies and information:
– COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of studies
– Palmer Foundation – Hydroxychloroquine official statements, trials and studies
– Sermo doctors reveal global COVID treatment patterns
– American Journal of Medicine Studies
Now, people like to bring up all the studies that deem Hydroxychloroquine a danger. Well, interestingly enough, the major study done by one of the most prestigious medical journals around the world, Lancet, was retracted after only a week.
Lancet’s editor, Richard Horton himself then publicly said that “this is a shocking example of research misconduct in the middle of a global health emergency,”
Yet, the damage was done.
Regarding the new mRNA vaccines, they are being administered to the public without any studies/data of long-term side effects.
In addition, the FDA itself states that it is not an approved vaccine and that it only gave permission to use on an emergency basis because there are no other medical treatments. However, it is not true that there are no other medical treatments, so in essence, there was no need for the FDA to issue an emergency authorization use for the vaccines. The information about the other treatments was being suppressed. Was the information about the treatments suppressed to push for the vaccine direction and only the vaccine direction? I have no clue, but everybody should be asking these questions.
Don’t trust me, read the exact verbiage from the FDA website:
1. https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
Excerpt from the above link:
WHAT IS THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.
And here is where the FDA explains why the vaccines were given emergency use authorization even though they are not approved (FDA language from above, not mine):
2. https://www.fda.gov/media/144412/download


Criteria for Issuance of Authorization
1. I have concluded that the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 when administered as described in the Scope of Authorization (Section II) meets the criteria for issuance of an authorization under Section 564(c) of the Act, because:1. SARS-CoV-2 can cause a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, including severe respiratory illness, to humans infected by this virus;
2. Based on the totality of scientific evidence available to FDA, it is reasonable to believe that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine may be effective in preventing COVID-19, and that, when used under the conditions described in this authorization, the known and potential benefits of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine when used to prevent COVID-19 outweigh its known and potential risks; and
3. There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19.3
Next.
While we all hope the mRNA vaccines will be the solution, nobody can answer the concerns about long-term effects. Below you can read that Pfizer itself admits that they do not know the long-term effects of the vaccine and that they will be tracking people & collecting data for years to learn about that information.
So, to all those who say this vaccine is NOT experimental, how would you call a situation where even the pharmaceutical company admits it will still be collecting data for years to come to learn about long-term effects?
Click here for the Pfizer document or check out the excerpt:

How long will you be watching people who have been vaccinated? How do we know that bad side effects can’t happen long after vaccination, if the vaccine’s only been studied for less than a year?
“We will track participants in our phase 3 clinical trial for the next two years following their second dose, in order to document the long-term effectiveness and safety of the vaccine.Our trial is closely monitored by Pfizer and an outside, independent group of experts called a Data Monitoring Committee, or DMC. Trial investigators also monitor participants’ health, and participants in the trial attend regular planned follow-up visits as part of the trial. Pfizer and BioNTech will be conducting additional studies to determine how effective and safe the vaccine is in the real world and among specific risk groups such as healthcare workers and among nursing home residents. The safety of patients is and always will be our number one priority.”
Understand, I believe it is fine to explain to people that even though it is not approved and even though Pfizer and the FDA don’t know if or what long-term side effects the vaccine will have, that it is still important to vaccinate. That is a logical approach.
As I have always said, this is a risk/benefit analysis that every person has the right to make.
But that is not what we are being told. We are being told that it is totally fine, it is FDA approved and we all must take it, and if not, then we can expect punishment and even being fired from our jobs.
That is totally wrong.
Each and every individual has the right to have all the information before making an informed medical decision.
There are other countries, like India, that said no to the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, and instead, doctors and states in India are using the Ivermectin treatment. Or US states like Florida that have only focused on vaccinating the high-risk population, but letting everyone else go on with life with open schools and shops etc. without forcing anyone to be vaccinated.
There is NO one solution.
Interestingly, the Council of Europe, which also promotes the vaccine direction, made a decision that vaccines must not be mandatory and the non-Vaccinated must not be discriminated against.

Excerpt:
7.3 with respect to ensuring high vaccine uptake:
7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
Lastly, nobody should be shamed or labeled a fear-mongerer or a “conspiracy theorist” just because they have real concerns and questions.
I warned that the Oslo accords would bring more terror and bloodshed and I was labeled a “fear-mongerer” by the media.
I warned that the Gaza disengagement would bring more terror and bloodshed and I was labeled a “fear-mongerer” by the media.
Today, anyone who raises concerns and questions about the virus and the vaccine is labeled a “fear-mongerer”.
No, we are not fear-mongerers for analyzing the facts and raising questions and concerns, that we expect to be answered and not shamed for raising. That is called “normal”.
Praying. Praying and praying, for all of us and all of humanity.
May we all have health and return to a time of normalcy and decency towards one another, regardless of our difference of opinions.
Click here for a very information 2 hour Q&A with Dr. Zelenko about the whole situation and his treatment.
To see the comments on the original facebook post